How To Select A Strong Trademark

red marker checking boxes

Your trademarks are likely the most vital assets your business will ever own. Consequently, your understanding of how to effectively adopt a trademark which distinguishes you from the competition is essential to the development and future goodwill of your brand. An inadequate trademark adoption process can embroil your company in contentious and protracted legal disputes, impede your marketing efforts, and interfere with licensing and expansion efforts. While there are no hard-and-fast rules of what constitutes successful trademark adoption, below are some useful guidelines to aid in your selection.


The two most important steps in adopting a trademark are: (1) creating a list of potential marks and (2) performing trademark clearance searches.


STEP 1. Develop List of Potential Trademarks


Before starting a new business venture, introducing a new product, or launching a new marketing campaign, you should create a list of potential or candidate trademarks. This is an important step because as you will learn later, a trademark clearance search should be conducted. If your search trademark clearance search yields unfavorable results for any of your marks, you will have an alternate list of marks to consider. Therefore, do not get too attached to any of the marks, as you may have to abandon the idea of using the favored mark or otherwise undertake the risk of continuing to use the favored mark with the knowledge that it may present future legal issues.


Inherently Distinctive Marks are the Strongest and Most Protectable


As you are developing the list of candidate marks, it is important to understand that the mark’s relative “strength” or “weakness,” will have a direct bearing on its performance in the market as well as the scope of legal protection the mark will be afforded. Trademarks generally fall into one of five categories: fanciful, arbitrary, suggestive, descriptive, or generic. These categories will significantly impact both the registrability as well as your ability to enforce your rights in the mark. The strongest and most easily protectable category of marks are fanciful marks and arbitrary marks - they are regarded as inherently distinctive. Conversely, descriptive and generic marks are regarded as less distinctive “weak” marks. Weak marks should be avoided - they simply do not have the same legal protections of a stronger and more distinctive mark.

Fanciful Marks. Fanciful trademarks are the strongest, most well protected, and have the highest probability of proceeding to registration. They are invented words with no dictionary or other known meaning. Some well-known examples of fanciful marks are: GOOGLE®, EXXON®, PEPSI®, and KODAK®.


Arbitrary Marks. Like fanciful marks, arbitrary marks are afforded a broad scope of protection against third-party use. Arbitrary marks are common words with a dictionary meaning, but the meaning is unrelated to the product or service to which it is applied. As is the case with fanciful marks, while the level and ease of protection is generally high, there is no direct association between the mark and the product or service, thus greater marketing power is required to create an association in the mind of the consumer. Well-known examples of arbitrary marks are APPLE® for computers, SHELL® for gasoline, CAMEL® for cigarettes, and BLACKBERRY® for mobile phones.


Suggestive Marks. If you are unable to or decide not to adopt a fanciful or arbitrary mark, a suggestive mark is your next best option. They are registrable and regarded as “strong” marks. Suggestive marks suggest some quality or characteristic of the products or services, but they do not directly describe the product or service. Thus, they require some imagination, thought, or perception for the consumer to come to a conclusion about the exact nature of the products or services. Examples of suggestive marks are KITCHENAID® for kitchen appliances because it suggests that the appliance is helpful for use in the kitchen; GREYHOUND® for bus services, because the customer has to use their imagination to conclude that the bus travels as fast as a Greyhound dog; JAGUAR® for vehicles for the symbolic value of the animal's speed and sleek body.


Descriptive Marks. Descriptive marks are generally considered “weak” and therefore more difficult to protect than fanciful, arbitrary, and suggestive marks. They are words or designs (e.g., depiction of a cellphone for mobile phone services) that describe a significant ingredient, quality, or characteristic of the goods or services. In addition, use of merely laudatory terms such as “best” or “quality,” which merely describe attributes of the product and likely to be unprotectable. These marks are difficult to register and equally as difficult to protect against infringement. The rationale behind this is to prevent businesses from monopolizing terms that competitors and others need to use in order to accurately describe their goods and services. However, if as a result of years of extensive and exclusive use, consumers begin to identify the descriptive mark as being associated with a single source of origin for that goods or service that mark acquires secondary meaning (or sometimes referred to as acquired distinctiveness). Once a descriptive mark has acquired distinctiveness, it becomes registerable and protectable. For example, COLD AND CREAMY as a trademark.


Generic Terms. A generic term is a word or phrase that is the common term associated with a particular category of goods or services and thus cannot function as a source indicator. Generic word marks are the weakest types of trademarks marks and are never registrable or enforceable against third-parties. Since generic words are the common everyday name for products and services, everyone has the right to use such terms to refer to their products and services. It is important to note, that even a fanciful mark can, over time become generic, if the owner permits the mark to be used improperly or fails to police the use of its mark properly and take appropriate action. Escalator and cellophane are classic examples of terms that once functioned as trademarks, but due to the trademark owner’s failure to adequately protect the marks, both became generic and are now used as the common names for the products. Some examples of generic terms which are nonregistrable and nonprotectable are: DRY CLEANER, SUGAR, or BLEACH.


spectrum of inherent distinctiveness

STEP 2. Have a Trademark Clearance Search Performed